|
|
Quartiere Pianello Save San Pietro Montalcino Tuscany |
History
of the Companions of San Pietro |
|
In
the 1300’s disciplined flagellants, with
penitential fervour, formed widespread movements in Tuscany. In
Montalcino one such movement was the Companions of the Church of San
Pietro. The Companions accumulated a huge patrimony which guaranteed their
aid and charity to the poor, derived mainly from landed property
possessions both outside and inside the walls of Montalcino. This was the
fruit of a broad grasp the Companions had on various strata of society
within the village of Montalcino. The
Companions, with religious and penitent aims and objectives, took in many
“brothers” and developed an exacting internal structure for their
society. This was a secular
movement of lay brothers quite separate from the church. They were not
priests nor ecclesiastically trained within the church. With considerable
expansion of their property derived not only from the wills of deceased
brothers, but also outside benefactors, they formed a body of disciplined
flagellants with a strong spirit of charity and devotion. Moral
responsibility and the exercise of power to condemn a brother who did not
respect the rules lay with the Prior who was elected by the brothers and
not nominated by ecclesiastical authority – another clear sign of the
completely lay character of the Companions. The Prior admonished,
corrected, punished and if necessary, expelled a Companion. He took care
of the observance of the rules, presided over meetings, ruled on
discipline, processions and every other aspect of the brotherhood. An
Administrator collected subscriptions, quotas, offerings, and the money
derived from pecuniary punishments levelled upon the brothers by the Prior.
He was like a banker and had to audit the accounts which, if they did not
balance, meant that he suffered a series of fines, and if he couldn’t
pay, he was “disciplined” or flagellated for as long as it took to
recite 25 Holy Father’s and 25 Ave Maria’s. A
Magistrate had custody of the material goods of the Companions, including
their cloaks, cords, chalices, cloths and he collected their offerings for
candles and during mass. These went to serve exclusively to pay the
priests who officiated in the church. He was also the custodian of books
and he had to transcribe many wills and testaments and keep lists of
inventories of all the possessions of the Companions. Other
Companions were responsible for distributing alms which were the fruit of
legacies and they had full liberty with the wise use and distribution of
the alms of the Companions. Losses were punished with pecuniary fines,
with the obligation to self discipline and flagellate in every church in
Montalcino. To
become a Companion, the person, after proposing certain information, had
to be judged to be of good morals and principles, had to pay a tax, offer
a pound weight of candle, was obliged to go to confession and communion,
buy his own vestments which comprised a cape or hooded cloak which was of
humble sack cloth with a tear or rip down the back for the practice of
flagellation, bound at the waist with a rope. Before he was accepted into
the Companions, another brother had to go guarantee for him, spiritually
and economically, and admittance was subject to a secret vote. The
ceremony of investiture was solemn, providing for the practice of
flagellation. There
are no signs of the affiliation of women. Although they did not
participate in religious practices, it seems that they were present at the
spectacular practice of flagellation. Exclusion of women was justified not
only because of modesty which prevented them from exposing their backs for
flagellation in the presence of others, but women could not participate in
public life and as a consequence this custom precluded them from belonging
to any association. Companions
came together to recite prayers, for manifestations of cult practices such
as flagellation, and in aid and charity work. For the rest of the time
they were lay men, living the life of a normal family and professional at
work or in business in Montalcino. But temporal obligations were not only
religious, for they had to behave always above sinfulness or they would be
expelled from the Companions. They
had to be obedient to the Prior and follow all regulations, receive the
Holy Sacraments, confess in public once a month, and take Communion at
least twice a year. Judging by long lists of brothers expelled from the
Companions for absence from Communion or confession, it appears that there
were many transgressors. They
were obliged to be present at mass every morning and they had to be in
church before the first ring of the bell. They had to recite prayers at
various moments of the day and to take part in processions such as on Good
Friday. A
deceased brother was dressed in his cloak of the Companions and his
brothers recited 100 Our Father’s and 100 Ave Maria’s and flagellated
for a month, praying for his soul. Another
obligation was silence. Companions could only speak with permission of the
Prior and every brother maintained secrecy so that information about the
Companions was not available to people outside the brotherhood. Companions
were prohibited from all games of gambling or dice, prohibited from going
to taverns, being a jurist, dancing, from lustfulness, money lending,
forming factions, disreputable singing, frequenting places of ill repute
and keeping bad company. It was forbidden to swear or blaspheme, tell
immoral stories, or to stay out late at night. Hate and causing insult or
injury to another were considered grave defects. Lack
of respect for women was a motive for expulsion; any brother who hit,
badly treated or betrayed a women could not remain a Companion. The
feeling of brotherhood constitutes one of the facets most important for
these lay Christians. Living by the rules of this medieval brotherhood was
not restricted to their behaviour in front of a few people around about,
but included everyone, even their adversaries. The
Companions came from various layers of society, from notaries to artisans,
merchants to farmers, and there were many poor people. There were
woolworkers, fabric makers, silk weavers, tailors, shoemakers, leather
workers, bricklayers, sword makers, saddlers, doctors, barbers, rope
makers, shop owners, writers, teachers and foot soldiers.
In Montalcino there did not exist associations of trades, but many
were part of the Companions of San Pietro including the leader of the wool
trade, dyers and leather workers. In 1331 there were 33 members, in 1371
there were 63, and in 1449 they numbered 79. The
Companions took possession of farms in the countryside, including
vineyards, and in 1353 to 1385 no less than 17 deceased persons willed all
their possessions to the Companions. Many people donated everything they
possessed to the Companions even while they were still alive. Almost all
of their landed possessions were situated at the foot of the hill of
Montalcino. Inside the walls they possessed vegetable gardens and houses
which were rented out or worked by the Companions. Their possessions
included many wine vats, barrels, animals which they bought and sold and
they received tribute in things like oil, wine and figs. They cultivated
grain, fava beans, chick peas, barley, garlic, linen, oil, white wine, and
red wine, Much of this was distributed to the poor or sold to buy candle,
or meat for the priests and for alms and charity. Young girls about to be
married were given not only money, but also a length of cloth. They
continually widened their charity outside the brotherhood, distributing
bread made by their mothers or wives, and at other times distributing
firewood, or giving donations to the children of the poorest families. Benefactors
left money indicating its destination and in 1365 the Companions paid for
restoration of a chapel in the Church of San Francesco and commissioned
Bartoli di Fredi to paint the altarpiece. The Companions remained active
for centuries without interruption until 1785 when they were suppressed by
Decree by the Grand Duke Leopold. The
Companions of San Pietro were mostly lay men, but there were some men of
the church admitted, although they were prohibited from holding important
responsibility in the organisation. This medieval model of Christian life
did not demand that they hide from the world in monasteries, but allowed
community life to continue and granted that they could be Companions and
brothers in Christ with penitence and reciprocal love, as well as
manifestations of flagellation and devotion. Sustaining each other
spiritually, morally and temporally and doing good works was to bring
eternal life and the love of God. Translated with kind permission of Maria Cristina Paccagnini. |
|
|
| TO TOP OF PAGE | HOME |